European Championship 2011 Velden
Double Consulting
3. Round
Double Consulting
3. Round
9 pts match, Score is Richard Lukas&Peter Urbantschitch: 9, Eva Zizkova & Honza Cerny:3
xg summery:
xg summery:
Nearly perfect checkerplay but again we messed up the performance rating with the cube. Peter is a peace of work to convince to double or take :) But thats no excuse. i was not sure enough to insist in my opinions concerning the cube. Winning this match will get us into the semifinals and the moneyprices.
xg summery:
| Eva Zizkova-Honza Cerny | Category | Richard Lukas-Peter Urbantschitsch |
| Advanced (-0.0186) | Total Error | Advanced (-0.0243) |
| Advanced (-0.0162) | Checker Play | World Class (-0.0095) |
| Intermediate (-0.0254) | Cube Play | Distracted (-0.0616) |
| 9.3 | Performance Rating | 12.1 |
| Eva Zizkova-Honza Cerny | Game Per Game | Richard Lukas-Peter Urbantschitsch |
| Expert (-0.0131) | Game 1 | Advanced (-0.0221) |
| World Champ. (+0.0000) | Game 2 | World Champ. (+0.0000) |
| World Class (-0.0083) | Game 3 | Distracted (-0.0789) |
| World Class (-0.0055) | Game 4 | World Class (-0.0085) |
| Casual Player (-0.0401) | Game 5 | World Champ. (+0.0000) |
| Advanced (-0.0214) | Game 6 | Expert (-0.0103) |
| World Class (-0.0095) | Game 7 | World Champ. (-0.0040) |
| Intermediate (-0.0276) | Game 8 | Distracted (-0.0830) |
| Intermediate (-0.0254) | Game 9 | Advanced (-0.0189) |
xg summery:
| Match simplified statistics (EMG Rated) | ||
| Player | Eva Zizkova-Honza Cerny | Richard Lukas-Peter Urbantschi |
| Rating | beginner | beginner |
| Overall | 12,756 | 17,362 |
| Checker play | 8,580 | 4,414 |
| Double | 1,974 | 11,203 |
| Take | 2,202 | 1,745 |
| Favorite | ||
| Eva Zizkova-Honza Cerny was 51,25% - 48,75% favorite. | ||
Nearly perfect checkerplay but again we messed up the performance rating with the cube. Peter is a peace of work to convince to double or take :) But thats no excuse. i was not sure enough to insist in my opinions concerning the cube. Winning this match will get us into the semifinals and the moneyprices.
Most interessting positions during the match:
After a perfect first game we did our first double error. Equity loss -0.070
correct decision double/take
________________________________________________________________________
The move didnt looked so bad to me but considered as blunder. Equity loss -0.107
correct move 13/11 13/7
_______________________________________________________________________
Here its already a blunder not to double. Winning chance 69% Gammon chance 21% Equity loss -0.207
correct decision double/take
________________________________________________________________________
Next move close the same. Winning chance 68% Gammonchance 4% Equity loss -0.107
correct decision double/take
_______________________________________________________________________
Really well played so far. 5. game and we had no checkerplay blunder. but also from our opponent just the second blunder here. Equity loss -0.175
correct move 13/7 6/1
__________________________________________________________________________
Score 4:1, Time to get a bit more agressive for our opponent but they are a bit hesitant.
Winning chance 65.5% Gammon chance 33.5%. Double blunder, equity loss -0.171
correct decision double/drop
________________________________________________________________________
Looks pretty convinient to me. We would have done the same i guess. But considered as blunder.
Equity loss -0.094
correct move 24/21 22/16
__________________________________________________________________________
I knew it, i knew it, i knew it :) But Peter wanted to double. Score 4:2. I finally agreed.With a Gammon Chance of 20% it was borderline. Equity loss just -0.004
correct decision too good to double/drop
_____________________________________________________________________________
I have to admit that our opponent had really crap rolls. Bunder equity loss -0.207
correct move Bar/20 13/7
__________________________________________________________________________
Our first checkerplay blunder in the match. We thought we have time and didnt wanted to risk getting behind in the race with getting hitted. Equity loss -0.210
correct move 24/15
____________________________________________________________________________
After seeing this blunder i was pretty confident to win the match. Well a bad antijoker again.
Equity loss -0.126
correct move 6/4 5/4(2)
___________________________________________________________________________
69% winchance, 33% gammonchance. this was it !!! a desperate take at score 5:3
blunder equity loss -0.264
correct decision double/drop
_____________________________________________________________________________
Looks pretty hopeless to me if there is not coming a series of magic rolls.
Blunder equity loss -0.127
correct move 24/18 9/8
_____________________________________________________________________________
Our second and last move blunder in the match. equity loss -0.141
correct move 24/18 11/9
____________________________________________________________________________
No error here but very interessting. i thought this double is a blunder but it wasnt.
with a winchance of just 46% and gammonchance of 25% the double was correct.
probably because the gammon would be a matchwinner otherwise the double wouldnt be good i think.
correct decision redouble/take
___________________________________________________________________________
We did it. We are at semi finals !!!!! yeeeeehaaaaa
despite the doubleblunders it was a pretty well played match and a deserved win i think.
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Here its already a blunder not to double. Winning chance 69% Gammon chance 21% Equity loss -0.207
________________________________________________________________________
Next move close the same. Winning chance 68% Gammonchance 4% Equity loss -0.107
_______________________________________________________________________
Really well played so far. 5. game and we had no checkerplay blunder. but also from our opponent just the second blunder here. Equity loss -0.175
__________________________________________________________________________
Score 4:1, Time to get a bit more agressive for our opponent but they are a bit hesitant.
Winning chance 65.5% Gammon chance 33.5%. Double blunder, equity loss -0.171
________________________________________________________________________
Looks pretty convinient to me. We would have done the same i guess. But considered as blunder.
Equity loss -0.094
__________________________________________________________________________
I knew it, i knew it, i knew it :) But Peter wanted to double. Score 4:2. I finally agreed.With a Gammon Chance of 20% it was borderline. Equity loss just -0.004
_____________________________________________________________________________
I have to admit that our opponent had really crap rolls. Bunder equity loss -0.207
__________________________________________________________________________
Our first checkerplay blunder in the match. We thought we have time and didnt wanted to risk getting behind in the race with getting hitted. Equity loss -0.210
____________________________________________________________________________
After seeing this blunder i was pretty confident to win the match. Well a bad antijoker again.
Equity loss -0.126
___________________________________________________________________________
69% winchance, 33% gammonchance. this was it !!! a desperate take at score 5:3
blunder equity loss -0.264
_____________________________________________________________________________
Looks pretty hopeless to me if there is not coming a series of magic rolls.
Blunder equity loss -0.127
_____________________________________________________________________________
Our second and last move blunder in the match. equity loss -0.141
____________________________________________________________________________
No error here but very interessting. i thought this double is a blunder but it wasnt.
with a winchance of just 46% and gammonchance of 25% the double was correct.
probably because the gammon would be a matchwinner otherwise the double wouldnt be good i think.
___________________________________________________________________________
We did it. We are at semi finals !!!!! yeeeeehaaaaa
despite the doubleblunders it was a pretty well played match and a deserved win i think.
____________________________________________________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment